The legal representatives of Prince Harry of the United Kingdom appeared before the High Court in London to present their arguments against the newspaper daily MailWho is the son of the disappeared Princess Diana From Wales, accusing him of defamation in two articles published by the mentioned media in February of this year.
grandson Queen Isabel II Indicates that the tabloid tried “Manipulation and distortion of public opinion” Regarding the media clashes he was engaged in with the British Home Office about the security measures that correspond to him when he visits United kingdom.
you can see: Jennifer Lopez on what it was like to share the stage with Shakira: ‘It was the worst idea in the world’
First of all, the judge in the case accepted the text presented by the prince’s lawyer, Justin Rushbrookwho argues that the information published by the media outlet was of a “defamatory nature”, which he denied Associated Newspapersthe organization that owns the aforementioned newspaper.
Controversy arose after Duke of Sussex He decided to move to the United States with his wife Meghan Markle The British royal family decided to withdraw his entitlements as a representative of the monarchy, which included personal protection when he was on English soil, despite the fact that the prince offered to pay for security expenses.
you can see: Britney Spears will marry Sam Ashghari today in an intimate ceremony in Los Angeles
Along the same lines, the tabloid reported that brother Prince Guillermo “He tried to keep his legal battle with the government over the police guard a secret, and only minutes after the story was published, his PR machine tried to give the feud a positive image,” which the royal decided to take. Legal action.
“Subtly charming bacon junkie. Infuriatingly humble beer trailblazer. Introvert. Evil reader. Hipster-friendly creator.”